'Aristotle and Weed Essay\r'

'What would Aristotle think about legalizing Marijuana? When attempting to speculate on how Aristotle would feel about this inquiry, I feel that scarce one thing must be addressed. What form of individual does marihuana make me, and does the legalization of marijuana increase or decrease a person’s ability to be happy and steady-going? What Kind of Person According to Aristotle, the difference betwixt animals and reality is our ability to quick of scentize and utilize intellectual. soldiery is at its most basic level rational animals.\r\nNon-rational beings only possess vegetative and appetitive aspects of their mind, whereas humans retain the most important, according to Aristotle, portion of the mind: the rational part. The reason that this is the most important is that it allows us to ascertain genuine happiness. Therefore, since animals and even children do zero(prenominal) possess the rational facet of the soul, they cannot achieve line up happiness. As huma ns, our advantage over non-rational beings is our ability to be happy, as defined by Aristotle. Happiness, he states, â€Å"is seemingly something complete and self-sufficient, since it is the end of the things achievable in action.\r\n” (NE 1097b20). So for Aristotle to approve of the legalization of it, marijuana would have to be something that would advance the happiness of humans and promote reason on the part of the soul. So does marijuana promote sensible choices and assist humans in our pastime for happiness? Well, when analyzed from a philosophical viewpoint, no. Using drugs diminishes our ability to utilize reason when set about with decisions. It modifies our mindset and transforms us from rational animals into just clear simple animals.\r\nDrugs can force one to twaddle with slurred speech, visibly alter their perceptions of what is going on around them, and even take their freedom of will. So the fact that marijuana decreases human ability to be rational, re asonable, and thus happy, I would have to say that Aristotle would scorn for most cases. However, medicative marijuana does promote happiness. If mortal has a disease in which the use of marijuana could numb his or her pain, I think that Aristotle would say that this is ok and good because it is assisting him or her in his or her quest for happiness, even if temporary.\r\nSo where would he expire the line between vice and virtue? I think that Aristotle would keep back the system that we have today. overabundance would be allowing everyone to purchase marijuana. Lack would be forbiddance it completely because it does have some benefits for the medical community. I think that the Mean would be allowing it to be apply for medicinal purposes only and not for public plan of attack because recurrent use does not promote rationalization and happiness. In conclusion, I think that Aristotle would not support the gain ground legalization of marijuana for personal use.\r\nAristotle would, however, not take action to ban it any win either. I think that he would be pith with how the system is today. Marijuana does have some medicinal benefits to people with painful diseases in that it creates, although fleeting, happiness. For normal people, however, repeated use of marijuana results in a deteriorated content to make rational decisions. It weakens our soul and forces us to contract irrational animals. This fact forces me to conclude that Aristotle would neither further nor reduce the current legal status of marijuana.\r\n'