Commentary for a Piece of Original Writing Essay

For my startle put up of original writing I intend to create a humans primarily pen for entertainment however, I in any case sine qua non to portray an interest into historical and political persuasions.I aim to compose this install for an audience of teenagers to young adult who be aged from almost fifteen to twenty-five and are male, I also wish to draw with those interested in political thrillers within this age range. The genre of which shall be a short fiction report card consisting chiefly of narrative and written in the third person. I picture this piece as macrocosm one of a collection of short stories concerned with the political-thriller fiction sub-genre. in spite of being a fiction text I aim to draw together in real world non-fiction.I was inspired to write a story of this nature after watching Luc Bessons The Professional, on base occupying material from Robert Harris, much(prenominal) as Archangel, Fatherland and ar peckum. I had previous experience reading this genre and being a big fan of Robert Ludlum I wanted to emulate the thrill I experienced from his work, in my own.To gain a firmer understanding of the style I would be pursuing I began to view examples of historical references from encyclopedias and journals and I also read books of historical sub-genre.This is my last write of this piece and I cast off do various alterations from the previous drafts to enhance it. In general the changes were simple things such as correcting spelling and punctuation, slightly more significant was the retell of concluding paragraphs to make it tidier and read or flow better. The most great modification was trimming the use of figurative language its use brings visual framework to the piece however overdoing it resulted in an awkward read.The changes I get to made were a result of feedback I had attained from my friends, family and potential audiences who read my first drafts and gave me their honest opinions regarding it. I cons ider the changes I have made prior to completion have certainly improved the final draft of this piece however, if I were to revise it once again I could stay fresh to make improvements.This piece has been constructed to exploit the expectations of the reader by diverging from the conventions of tralatitious story telling beginning, middle and end, respectively. By challenging this system I hope I have created an original piece that intrigues the reader.through stunned the piece I have tried to maintain an atmosphere of consternation and to do so I have used many different grammatic and lexical techniques, for instance the use of certain semantic fields that are vernacular with post cold war Russia such as KGB, Prospekts and Klashnikov AK-47. I have also written using the semantic field of nincompoop and creating a ghost for the attitudes of the time. Again it can be shown here by smog, sodden and orifice. Together these images conjure up the olfactory propertying of treachero usness and uneasiness. These words also relate to the sociolect of my political thriller enthusiasts that would have come across such words in the past. This gives them a sense of appreciation and common territory.I have chosen certain words to optimize the put in of connotation, exempli gratia I use the word smog in place of hide or haze this is because smog has a polluted feeling, again reiterating the industrial power of Russia and the unwelcome feeling of wartime. This is complemented with the word lingered as opposed to stayed as an adverb to describe the smog.Not only have I used the emotional effects of connotation but combined with the use of figurative ornaments such as metaphors and similes e.g. like a sodden quilt, and alliteration e.g. bald-pated bloated body, I have drawn a picture of light Moscow through the lexis.To add some humour and variety into the piece I have played around with the pragmatics of certain situations, one of which is when Vladimir and Nikola i are talking, he and I went back as far as Cuba and we had no secrets. what I have tried to imply is the possibility of Vladimir being homosexual, which Nikolai picks up on and questions in the conversation.At the end of the piece I defeat writing from third person into first person I can hear, and their souls, this is so I can comment objectively on the events that had revealed themselves and drive the reader to resolve the story according to their own reading of it.The story is presented through narrative prose, using paragraphs to separate the text into more important and accessible sections. Adjacency pairs determine the order of dialogue to replicate that of intercommunicate text.Upon commencing this piece of writing it was my ambition to amuse and beguile an audience of alike(p) cultural elation to myself. The desire to write such a piece fired me with zeal and left my feeling rather ebullient.I feel I have successfully completed what I set out to do and by recording the response of my target audience to my final piece the consensus was that this was true.