Coco Chanel Essay -- Fashion Designers Essays

Coco ChanelIn his 1993 book, Creating Minds, Howard Gardner attempted to distinguish characteristics that were common to seminal people. In doing so, he concluded that many factors were involved in the outgrowth of a designer. For instance, the relationship between the Individual, the Work, and Other People (i.e. family and colleagues) (Gardner 9) was elemental in predicting future successes. Likewise, part of his hypothesis focused around the fact that creators typically make their mark in one single genre. He dual-lane the types of work that could be take a leakd into seven different areas interpersonal, intrapersonal, visual/spatial, logical/mathematical, musical, oral/linguistic, body kinesthetic (Gardner vii). Gardners rubric for finding commonalties amongst creators, or those people who earn innovative, influential works in their particular domain, has become a highly regarded and widely used tool for identifying creative genius. Likewise, one key factors promoting creat iveness was the bare(a) place of the creator. Gardner briefly mentions the importance of the relationship between the creator and their society (Gardner 42). In my opinion, Gardner gives too little attention to the importance of ones peripheral status. I intend to show, through the example of Coco Chanel, that marginality can get to an imperative impact on the development of ones creativity. Therefore, I will befit Chanel into the prescribed rubric that Gardner outlined in his book, and show how her marginal status defined her as well as her work.Part OneThe in the flesh(predicate) History of Chanel Chanel was born in 1883, illegitimately (Charles-Roux 9/3) to a dumbfound that would soon desert her, and a mother who would die by the magazine she reached the age ... ... different perspective on things. Perhaps she was creative because she did non know how to be traditional. Maybe what seemed normal to Chanel, what felt natural for her, was plainly different from what was no rmal for others.In any case, I feel that Chanels marginal status was the main catalyst for her success as a fake designer. Gardner overlooked the degree of importance that should be attributed to a creators marginality. For in the end, to create is to do something original, what has never been done before. And to do something unique should mean to be unique. And to be unique and creative means to be marginal.BibliographyCharles-Roux, Edmonde. Chanel and Her World. The Vendome Press London. 1979.Gardner, Howard. Creating Minds. canonical Books New York.1993. Madsen, Axel. Chanel A Woman of Her Own. Henry Holt and Co. New York. 1990.