Shifting the Social Balance Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Shifting the Social Balance - Essay ExampleThis shift represents a major step in the development of civilization because it focuses on hard evidence, observable fact, and verifiable conclusions. Science opened up the possibility of questioning long-held beliefs and examining them for truth trance the Enlightenment made it possible to hold these debates in public, even refuting concepts that proved inaccurate. Revolutionary tools and ideas illustrate how the Scientific Revolution influenced society while the Enlightenment unwaveringly established science and reason as the only logical standard on which to base worldly human thought. Copernicus, somewhat by accident, touched pip the Scientific Revolution in the early 16th century when he wrote to Pope Paul III for support in his recent astrological findings. development solid math, appropriate research and direct observation, Copernicus concluded that the Earth revolved around the sun rather than, as the Church would have people be lieve, the solarise revolving around the Earth (Copernicus 1543 cited in Levick, 2004 524). His evidence was meticulously outlined and his conclusions were sound, but his ideas were introduced to a mostly unreceptive public who still preferred to believe they were of import to Gods creation. Galileo, introducing some of these same ideas, would gain greater exposure for the idea thanks to the recent invention of the telescope. This made it possible for other people to go and mention with their own eyes the rotations both Galileo and Copernicus had outlined - helped a bit with Galileos high-class star-gazing parties (Kaku, 2008). Through a simple telescope such as those used by Galileo and his friends, it is possible to see the craters of the moon and the orbits of some of the moons of Jupiter. These observations, combined with sound mathematic principles, made it possible for Galileo, and Copernicus, to prove reality. All reasonings about mechanics have their foundations in geomet ry, in which I do not see that largeness and smallness make large circles subject to properties different from those of small ones (Levick, 2004 322).